Would appreciate some logical/certainty explanation. Obviusly, the S/C do not want to remeasure but wants to be paid full as order (qty might had decrease)and also claim the excavation in copncrete too. The route will cross a concrete foundation and the original BQ do not included excavation in concrete.ġ) PRINCPLE: Do we remeasure because the work had changed?Ģ) In such a case, Fidic contract, should it be a Lump Sum pay on completion of the work plus a claim on the extra over excavation in concrete foundation?Ĥ) Do any of these phase: "Sub Contract Sum" or "Order Value" or "Tender Sum" OR "Sum" play a part? On the first day on site, the new drawings showed the drains route had change. Order is eventually given based on their quotation, priced up the BQ (inclusive prelim etc) The enquiry sent to the Civil work subcontractor is drawings, spec and a BQ (The BQ is produced by the Main Contractor based on the drawings) The subcontract is also a Fidic with amendment. I am working on a contract where the main contract is Fidic. Hence, this research addresses the threats to the contractor’s cash flow and entitlements stemming from the remeasurement process under public works contracts. Like yourself, I am always confuse regarding whether is remeasure or not. Under public works contracts, financing is by the public fund, so some legal restrictions are made to prevent manipulation of the public benefit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |